Case study · Attrition and retention

Strengthening Retention Through Better Manager Experience

Over nine months, we helped the organisation connect attrition patterns with manager capability, career conversations and earlier action on retention risks.

Reference case · Illustrative figures
14.8% → 9.6%Voluntary attrition
100 → 65Regrettable exits
54% → 73%Confidence in career growth
Explore the results

The impact

Fewer exits accompanied stronger management and career indicators

These reference measures show the movement from the starting condition to the outcome the intervention was designed to strengthen.

The figures are illustrative reference values from the Impact in Action portfolio; they are not independently verified client results.

Voluntary attrition
Before14.8%
After9.6%
Regrettable exits
Before100
After65
Confidence in career growth
Before54%
After73%
Duration
9 months
Focus
Voluntary and regrettable exits
Review rhythm
Quarterly retention reviews

The change in numbers

Before and after.

Each indicator has its own scale and unit.
Changes are shown in plain language.

Voluntary attrition−5.2 points
Before14.8%
After9.6%

A reduction of 5.2 percentage points in the reported attrition rate.

Lower is better
Regrettable exits−35%
Before100
After65

Indexed volume: baseline = 100. This is not an employee count.

Lower is better · Index, baseline = 100
Manager effectiveness+22 points
Before61%
After83%

Manager effectiveness increased by 22 percentage points.

Higher is better
Confidence in career growth+19 points
Before54%
After73%

Confidence in career growth increased by 19 percentage points.

Higher is better

The figures are illustrative reference values from the Impact in Action portfolio; they are not independently verified client results.

How to read these figures

The source supplies before-and-after attrition rates and an indexed measure of regrettable exits. It does not specify the reporting window or employee denominator, so the charts do not imply a headcount or annualised rate.

Exit data showed a problem but did not explain where to act

Leadership could see that people were leaving. Exit interviews mentioned pay, management, growth and workload, but the mix of explanations made a focused response difficult. A single attrition rate also concealed important differences. Losing a new joiner and losing an experienced person in a critical role called for different questions.

The diagnosis traced patterns across tenure, roles and managers

The diagnosis segmented attrition by employee population, tenure, manager, role and career stage. This made it possible to examine whether particular groups experienced the same difficulty. Stay interviews added the perspective of people still in the organisation, who could describe what made staying attractive or uncertain.

Retention became a regular management conversation

The response combined manager capability building with stay interviews, career conversations and clearer visibility of internal mobility. Managers needed to listen, recognise an emerging concern and agree an action they could follow through. HR needed a consistent way to bring recurring issues back to leadership.

  1. 01

    Locate the risk

    Segment exits and listen to employees who remain in the organisation.

  2. 02

    Improve the experience

    Build manager conversations and make career and mobility options clearer.

  3. 03

    Review action

    Use quarterly reviews to track patterns and follow through on agreed responses.

Fewer exits accompanied stronger management and career indicators

The reference figures show voluntary attrition moving from 14.8% to 9.6%, a fall of 5.2 percentage points. Regrettable exits are presented on an index, with the starting level set to 100 and the final level at 65. That represents a 35% reduction; it is not a count of 100 employees.

← All intervention case studies

Start a focused conversation

What would a stronger result look like for your organisation?

Tell us the challenge, the people involved and the outcome you need to improve.

Discuss an intervention